[maker-devel] The est_gff option
Sean.Li at csiro.au
Sean.Li at csiro.au
Wed Aug 1 19:21:08 MDT 2012
Hello,
We are trying to add RNA-Seq data into the Maker run. As they have been properly aligned to our draft scaffolds by Cufflinks, we just gave the appropriate gff file to the est_gff option. The gff file is with the following format:
....
scaffold_56 Cufflinks match_part 248833 249471 . + . ID=1:TCONS_00039698:exon-1;Name=1:TCONS_00039698;Parent=1:TCONS_00039698;Target=1:TCONS_00039698 121525597 121526235 +;
scaffold_56 Cufflinks match_part 253262 253362 . + . ID=1:TCONS_00039698:exon-2;Name=1:TCONS_00039698;Parent=1:TCONS_00039698;Target=1:TCONS_00039698 121526236 121526336 +;
....
All the prediction algorithms have been trained before running Maker. Meanwhile, we provided the protein homology evidence. By simply checking the run.log file, I couldn't find any records that show how RNA-Seq got involved into the prediction process (no blastn or exonerate for est). Is there anything I missed so the RNA-Seq evidence didn't include in the prediction? Do I need to turn the est2genome on, since I suspect this option is only used when the algorithms aren't trained properly? Or, do we need to set the value of pcov_blastn and eval_blastn a bit lower?
Thanks!
Regards,
Sean
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://yandell-lab.org/pipermail/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org/attachments/20120802/50cfa71d/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the maker-devel
mailing list