[maker-devel] Maker predicting fusion genes?

[Carson Holt]

The image doesn’t show all evidence sources, but the short answer is that
one of you evidence sources (est2genome, protein2genome, or blastx)
bridges the two regions, and when provided the bridged hint one of the
gene predictors thinks it makes sense to create a single model instead.
my guess is that it’s blastx evidence.

—Carson


On 2/23/14, 9:57 AM, "Mikael Brandström Durling" <mikael.durling at slu.se>
wrote:

>Dear list and maker developers,
>
>I was browsing the results of a recent maker run, focusing on differences
>between this run with the a recent maker (svn r1067) and a previous run
>with svn revision 1022 (I recall). One of the differences I found was a
>gene lost in the new prediction set, but replaced by an extended version
>of a previous neighbor (see
>http://figshare.com/articles/Maker_prediction_comparison/942300).  As you
>can see, there is no support for the join in the evidence. Do you have
>any clue to what might cause this?
>
>Best regards,
>Mikael Durling
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>maker-devel mailing list
>maker-devel at box290.bluehost.com
>http://box290.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org