[maker-devel] Alternative splicing options
Daniel Ence
dence at genetics.utah.edu
Fri May 23 08:55:50 MDT 2014
Hi Felipe,
The alternative splice option is full-developed and functional option in MAKER. What it does is tell MAKER to consider gene models with mutually exclusive evidence. For example, if there are two models at a locus and evidence that supports one exon in one model and a different exon in another model, both those models might make it into the final geneset.
>From the workflow you described, I think you'd have to redo only the fourth and final round of MAKER annotation. As a general principle for trying out new options on your annotations, I'd recommend choosing a big scaffold, running it with alt_splice=1, and seeing how you like the results.
~Daniel
Daniel Ence
Graduate Student
dence at genetics.utah.edu<mailto:dence at genetics.utah.edu>
Eccles Institute of Human Genetics
University of Utah
15 North 2030 East, Room 2100
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5330
On May 22, 2014, at 10:13 PM, Felipe Barreto <fbarreto at ucsd.edu<mailto:fbarreto at ucsd.edu>>
wrote:
Hi, all,
I just finished a fourth and final iterative round with Maker, training predictors in between, and I am very happy with the results. What I would like to try now is to annotate alternative splicing variants, and I know the ctrl file has the alt_splice option.
However, I am intrigued by the lack of information regarding this option. I could not find many discussions in this group, and most genome publications using Maker are unclear about whether they annotated alternative transcrips, so my guess is they didn't.
So I was wondering whether there is a reason for that. Is that function not well developed in Maker? Should I stay away from it?
Assuming it is OK to give it a try (provided I don't get discouraged here), what is the best approach to take, considering I already obtained what I considered is a solid set of gene models after four rounds of annotation? Should I start over by turning on alt_splice, and training gene predictors from those outputs? Or would it be appropriate to simply repeat my latest round, changing only alt_splice=1?
Thanks for any help. I can see the light at the end of the tunnel!
Felipe
--
Felipe Barreto
Post-doctoral Scholar
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, CA 92093
_______________________________________________
maker-devel mailing list
maker-devel at box290.bluehost.com<mailto:maker-devel at box290.bluehost.com>
http://box290.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://yandell-lab.org/pipermail/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org/attachments/20140523/80a43add/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the maker-devel
mailing list