[maker-devel] A way to compare 2 annotation runs?

[Carson Holt]

I’m going to ask Michael Campbell to answer this. He wrote a protocols paper that will help.

—Carson



> On Apr 19, 2016, at 6:08 AM, Florian <fdolze at students.uni-mainz.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> We ran MAKER on a newly assembled genome for 3 iterations, since 2 seems to be the recommended standard and while on holiday I just ran it a third time. Now I want to compare the results of the iterations to see where the annotation (hopefully) improved/changed but I cant really come up with a clever way to this.
> 
> I reckon this has to be an often solved problem though I couldnt find a solution except an older entry in this mail-list but that wasnt helpful.
> 
> 
> So how are people assessing quality of a maker run? How do you say one run was 'better' than another?
> 
> 
> best regards & thanks for your input,
> Florian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> maker-devel mailing list
> maker-devel at yandell-lab.org
> http://yandell-lab.org/mailman/listinfo/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org