[maker-devel] Possible ways to improve annotated gene numbers
Qihua Liang
qlian003 at ucr.edu
Fri Jun 30 13:30:19 MDT 2017
Dear Maker Development Team,
Hi, I am using Maker for annotation and BUSCO to evaluate the completeness.
For de novo perditions, I am using Augustus, GeneMark, and SNAP, and the annotated proteins have completeness of ~80%, ~50%, ~50% correspondingly. When I cat all de novo annotated proteins of these three tools, the completeness is much higher as ~92%.
But for all.maker.proteins.fasta, the completeness is only ~80%.
1. Does this mean that some proteins annotated by Augustus/GeneMark/SNAP, are not included in the file all.maker.proteins.fasta? Does it because such excluded proteins do not have hits with the EST evidences?
2. To achieve a higher BUSCO completeness, what possible ways can be used? Including more EST evidences from other species?
Thank you
Qihua
More information about the maker-devel
mailing list