[maker-devel] About eAED

[Carson Holt]

This one is an even better explanation than the answer I just gave. Thank you.

—Carson

> On Oct 4, 2017, at 4:35 PM, Xabier Vázquez-Campos <xvazquezc at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Carson commented on this here
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/maker-devel/wtmNRtRa-ko/iC4KTuIitGEJ <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/maker-devel/wtmNRtRa-ko/iC4KTuIitGEJ>
> 
> On 5 October 2017 at 09:31, Quanwei Zhang <qwzhang0601 at gmail.com <mailto:qwzhang0601 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> I ran the maker2 pipeline and got the default gene sets (with AED<1). But I found there are several hundred genes with eAED 1. 
> 
> Below is an example, the gene has AED 0.05 and eAED 1. I wonder what can be the reason of the great difference between AED and eAED. For this gene it has a very low AED score, is it still a reliable gene model if its eAED equals 1?  
> 
> >maker-Contig2656-snap-gene-269.6-mRNA-1 protein AED:0.05 eAED:1.00 QI:75|0|0|1|0|0|2|111|35
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Best
> Quanwei
> 
> _______________________________________________
> maker-devel mailing list
> maker-devel at box290.bluehost.com <mailto:maker-devel at box290.bluehost.com>
> http://box290.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org <http://box290.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Xabier Vázquez-Campos, PhD
> Research Associate
> NSW Systems Biology Initiative
> School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences
> The University of New South Wales
> Sydney NSW 2052 AUSTRALIA
> _______________________________________________
> maker-devel mailing list
> maker-devel at box290.bluehost.com
> http://box290.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://yandell-lab.org/pipermail/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org/attachments/20171004/0a4d4b4d/attachment-0003.html>